Aggregated News From Investment Management Regulators

ASIC commences proceedings against CBA for overcharged interest – Royal Commission case study

Report/Flag

Please complete the required fields.



ASIC has today commenced civil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court against the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) for charging a rate of interest on business overdraft accounts substantially higher than what its customers were advised.

ASIC alleges from 29 December 2011 to 31 March 2018, CBA:

  • provided customers with terms and conditions for certain credit facilities that stated an interest rate to be charged or that had been charged (in most cases, 16% per annum);
  • sent periodic account statements to customers referencing the rate at which interest rate was being charged (in most cases, 16% per annum); and
  • due to a systems error, charged more than 2,200 customers a different, higher interest rate on their overdraft accounts (in most cases approximately 34% per annum).

The total overcharged interest exceeded $2.9 million.

ASIC alleges that CBA attempted to manually fix the overcharging error after a complaint was made to the bank in 2013. The manual fixes were unsuccessful, and customers continued to be overcharged. ASIC alleges that from 1 December 2014 to 31 March 2018, being within the six-year limitation period, CBA engaged in conduct that contravened financial services laws. Specifically, that on 12,119 occasions, CBA:

  • made a misleading representation in contravention of s12DB(1)(g) of the ASIC Act;
  • engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct, or conduct that was likely to mislead or deceive, in contravention of s12DA(1) of the ASIC Act; and
  • failed to comply with its obligation to comply with financial services laws in contravention of s912A(1)(c) of the Corporations Act.

ASIC is seeking declarations, pecuniary penalties and other orders against CBA.

The date for the first case management hearing is yet to be scheduled by the Court.

Download

Background

CBA’s conduct was the subject of a case study by the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry – see Volume 2 of the Interim Report (page 304-308).

CBA has set up a remediation program that has so far compensated $4 million to the customers impacted in this case.

ASIC previously obtained a $5 million penalty against CBA for failures of their AgriAdvantage Plus Package. These failures included, amongst other things, overcharged interest on loans and fees ().

Source link

Regulator Information

Abbreviation: ASIC
Jurisdiction: Australia

Recent Articles

Fraudsters Posing as Brokers or Investment Advisers – Investor Alert

The FBI Criminal Investigative Division and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy (OIEA) warn of fraudsters swindling investors while preten

Announcement: FMA imposes a sanction against S Immo AG for delayed publication of a proprietary transaction

The Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA) hereby announces that it has imposed a fine of EUR 16,000.00 by means of a penal order under...

Origin Capital Group (clone of FCA authorised firm)

Fraudsters are using the details of firms we authorise to try to convince people that they work for a genuine, authorised firm. Find out...

best-isa-comparison.com

We believe this firm may be providing financial services or products in the UK without our authorisation. Find out why you should be wary...

Financial Stability Report (2020 annual report)​

Compliance Details javascript:commonShowModalDialog(‘{SiteUrl}/_layouts/itemexpiration.

Get the latest from Regulatory.News in your inbox!

×