Aggregated News From Investment Management Regulators

ESMA fines Scope Ratings €640,000 for failings in covered bonds ratings


Please complete the required fields.

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s securities markets regulators, has fined Scope Ratings GmbH (Scope) €640,000, and issued a public notice, for breaches of the Credit Rating Agencies Regulation (CRAR) in relation to the systematic application of its 2015 Covered Bonds Methodology (CBM) and its revision.

In both instances Scope committed the infringements negligently and failed to meet the special care expected from a credit rating agency (CRA) as a professional firm in the financial services sector.

Scope’s breaches of the Credit Rating Agencies Regulation (CRAR)

·         Failure to apply methodology systematically – €550,000

In 2015, Scope had adopted a CBM which included, in addition to an analysis of the issuer credit strength, an analysis consisting of two further steps, the first being an analysis of the legal framework and the resolution regime, while the second involved an analysis of the cover pool of underlying loans (cover pool). The CBM also specified that a thorough analysis of the cover pool had to be performed for all rated covered bonds.

However, ESMA found that Scope failed to systematically apply its CBM, since the ratings issued in September and November 2015 did not comprise the type of analysis of the cover pool which was foreseen by the CBM. This had the effect of 559 ratings being issued without analysis being conducted according to the publicly disclosed CBM, out of a total of 622 ratings issued under the 2015 CBM.

·         Failure in methodology revision – €90,000

ESMA also found that Scope, before making material changes to its CBM in 2016, failed to inform ESMA and publicly consult with stakeholders on the proposed amendments which were later implemented.

Scope did not, as required by the CRAR:

·         notify ESMA of the intended material changes to the CBM;

·         publish on its website the proposed material changes to the CBM and invite comments from stakeholders; and

·         notify ESMA of changes due to this consultation.

The changes introduced in 2016 to the CBM were material, as they modified the conditions under which an assessment of the cover pool had to be performed under this methodology.

CRAR Obligations

The quality of credit rating methodologies, their systematic design and application and their public disclosure is a key objective of the CRAR. Methodologies must be systematic by design and applied systematically in producing ratings so that investors are protected from arbitrary decisions by a CRA to depart from its public methodology without an objective reason for doing so. This is a key condition for ratings to remain sound and reliable. CRAs must follow several steps when changing their Methodologies, involving disclosure of the changes, public consultation, disclosure of stakeholder comments and informing ESMA. Given the role of CRAs and ratings in financial markets, and their impact on investor trust and confidence, it is essential that ratings are based on sound, reliable and transparently designed methodologies.

Right of appeal

Scope may appeal against this decision to the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities. Such an appeal does not suspend the fine, although it is possible for the Board of Appeal to suspend the application of the decision in accordance with Article 60(3) of the ESMA Regulation.

Source link

Regulator Information

Abbreviation: ESMA
Jurisdiction: ESMA

Recent Articles

2022 Annual Report — GFSC

The Commission has today published its Read more

Royal Investment Consortium (the scam entity)

Royal Investment Consortium (the scam entity) Public Statement Royal Investment Consortium (the scam entity) www.royalinvestmentconsortium (the website) [email protected] (the email address) Issued: 31 May 2023 Banking Business (Jersey) Law...

The AMF Ombudsman publishes her 2022 Annual Report

Record number of cases processed and recommendations The number of case referrals to the AMF Ombudsman, which had surged by 33% in 2021, remained practically stable last year, at 1,900 requests, i.e.

Hopkins Money (Clone of FCA authorised firm)

Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal...

Get the latest from Regulatory.News in your inbox!