Aggregated News From Investment Management Regulators

ESMA publishes its first reports on CSDR implementation

Report/Flag

Please complete the required fields.



The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s securities markets regulator, has today published its first two reports on the implementation of the Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CSDR) covering central securities depositories’ (CSDs) cross-border services and handling of applications as well as internalised settlement.

Report on Cross-Border Services and Application Handling

The Report on cross-border services and handling of applications highlights the findings related to the provision of services by CSDs in other Member States, and considers the responses to the ESMA survey addressed to National Competent Authorities (NCAs), CSDR relevant authorities and trade associations, in June and July. The report also uses the data collected by ESMA to determine the substantial importance of a CSD for host Member States. 

The CSDs’ cross-border activity has been measured through the study of the links established between European Economic Area (EEA) CSDs and of the services provided to participants and issuers from other Member States. No major variations in the provision of cross-border services have been detected since the entry into force of CSDR, but most respondents do foresee a potential increase in the coming years. They have also pointed out challenges, in particular linked to the application process to provide notary and central maintenance services in relation to securities constituted under the laws of other Member States, as set out under Article 23 of CSDR. The Report includes suggestions to simplify the existing process.

Report on Internalised Settlement

The Report on internalised settlement presents the findings related to the settlement activity which does not take place through a securities settlement system operated by a CSD in the EEA. It takes into account the responses to the ESMA survey on internalised settlement conducted in June and July, and also includes an analysis of the internalised settlement data based on the quarterly reports sent by settlement internalisers under Article 9 of CSDR for the period Q2 2019 – Q3 2020.

While no major risks have been identified during the period covered by the report, NCAs have identified some risks related to this activity, the most common being operational risk and custody risk, which could be mitigated through adequate identification of the clients’ accounts involved, and the improvement of operational processes.

The challenges encountered when implementing the internalised settlement reporting regime seem normal in terms of any new reporting requirements. ESMA, to support the implementation process, has provided additional clarifications through supervisory convergence measures, including the ESMA Guidelines on internalised settlement reporting, as well as Q&As.

ESMA considers that custodians’ clients should be informed of the risks and costs associated with internalised settlement, and highlights the importance of continuing to monitor internalised settlement, in order to assess if this activity should be regulated in the future.

ESMA expects these reports to contribute to the upcoming review of CSDR by the European Commission.

Source link

Regulator Information

Abbreviation: ESMA
Jurisdiction: ESMA

Recent Articles

2022 Annual Report — GFSC

The Commission has today published its Read more

Royal Investment Consortium (the scam entity)

Royal Investment Consortium (the scam entity) Public Statement Royal Investment Consortium (the scam entity) www.royalinvestmentconsortium (the website) [email protected] (the email address) Issued: 31 May 2023 Banking Business (Jersey) Law...

The AMF Ombudsman publishes her 2022 Annual Report

Record number of cases processed and recommendations The number of case referrals to the AMF Ombudsman, which had surged by 33% in 2021, remained practically stable last year, at 1,900 requests, i.e.

Hopkins Money (Clone of FCA authorised firm)

Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal...

Get the latest from Regulatory.News in your inbox!

×