Aggregated News From Investment Management Regulators

Reply to Parliamentary Question on surrendered life insurance policies and regulation of sale of life insurance policies in secondary market

Report/Flag

Please complete the required fields.



QUESTION NO 332

NOTICE PAPER 195 OF 2020

FOR WRITTEN ANSWER

Date: For Parliament Sitting on 4 January 2021

Name and Constituency of Member of Parliament

Mr Murali Pillai, MP, Bukit Batok SMC

Question:

To ask the Prime Minister (a) over the past three years, what has been the percentage of life insurance policies that have been surrendered on a per year basis; and (b) whether MAS intends to regulate the secondary market involving the sale of life insurance policies so as to protect the policy holders’ long-term interests and to prevent them from prematurely surrendering their life policies for reasons other than the inability to make premium payments.

Answer by Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Senior Minister and Minister in charge of MAS:

1. The percentage of life insurance policies surrendered averaged 1.1% per year during 2017 to 2019. In the first three quarters of 2020, the percentage of policies surrendered was about 0.7%.

2. Policyholders who surrender their policies may not be able to find a policy with similar coverage at the same cost once it has been terminated. MAS has put out financial education messages targeted at policyholders on the risks or disadvantages associated with surrendering or selling their life insurance policies. For policyholders who are unable to pay premiums, insurers have been providing them some support, such as offering grace period for payment and premium loans.

3. There are also situations where holding on to a life insurance policy no longer makes financial sense. For example, when the insurance coverage is no longer required because the policyholder does not have a dependent anymore, or where the policyholder has more important alternate uses for the cash value in the policy. Under these circumstances, the policyholder may sell his policy in a secondary market for a higher cash value to a third party company, who in turn sells it to investors.

4. These third party companies are currently not regulated in Singapore. This is similar to other jurisdictions such as Hong Kong and Japan. While they are regulated in the US and UK, the focus is on the protection of investors who purchase the re-sold policies rather than the policyholders. We will continue to monitor the market for potential risks, and will introduce regulatory safeguards if necessary.

This news item was originally published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS SG). For more information, see the Source Link.

Regulator Information

Abbreviation: MAS
Jurisdiction: Singapore

Recent Articles

The SEC Levels Up: Statement on In re Activision Blizzard

Feb. 3, 2023 Today, the Commission announced a $35 million settlement with Activision Blizzard Inc. (“Activision Blizzard”).

Mr William Stephen Cairns (date of Birth 15 January 1949) of Key West, Doyle Road, St Peter Port Guernsey GY1 1RG — GFSC

Date of prohibition order pursuant to section 33 of the Financial Services Business (Enforcement Powers) (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2020 and prohibited functions: From 2 February 2023 until 2 July

Mr Du Preez Gert Vermeulen (Date of Birth 5 August 1987) of Doyle Court, Doyle Road, St Peter Port Guernsey GY1 1RD

Date of prohibition order pursuant to section 33 of the Financial Services Business (Enforcement Powers) (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2020 and prohibited functions: From 2 February 2023 until 2 Mar

Publication of a Notice of the fact of a Prohibition Order and a Discretionary Financial Penalty — GFSC

On 2 February 2023, the Commission imposed discretionary financial penalties as follows:  Mr William Stephen Cairns (“Mr Cairns”) a financial penalty of £133,000; and  Mr Du Preez Gert Vermeulen (“M

Get the latest from Regulatory.News in your inbox!

×