Aggregated News From Investment Management Regulators

SFC reprimands and fines Mega International Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. $7 million for regulatory breaches over CIS sale

Report/Flag

Please complete the required fields.



The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has reprimanded and fined Mega International Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. (MICBC) $7 million over MICBC’s internal system and control failures in relation to the sale of collective investment schemes (CISs) (Note 1).

Following a referral from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the SFC conducted an investigation which found that, in the course of selling CISs to clients between August 2014 and July 2015, MICBC had failed to implement adequate and effective systems and controls to (Note 2):

  • properly assess its clients’ investment objective, risk tolerance level and knowledge of derivatives;
  • ensure the investment recommendations and/or solicitations made to its clients were reasonably suitable in all the circumstances;
  • conduct adequate product due diligence on certain funds;
  • ensure all relevant factors were properly taken into account before assigning the funds risk ratings; and
  • identify funds which constituted derivative products.

In deciding the sanction, the SFC took into account that:

  • MICBC took remedial actions to strengthen its suitability framework;
  • MICBC engaged an independent reviewer to validate whether the findings raised by the HKMA during the onsite examination are fully addressed and whether its control mechanisms operate effectively in accordance with its internal policies and procedures, and undertook to submit the validation review report to the SFC and the HKMA as soon as it is available;
  • there is no evidence that MICBC’s failures resulted in losses borne by its clients;
  • MICBC cooperated with the SFC in resolving its concerns; and
  • MICBC has no previous disciplinary record with the SFC.

End

Notes:

  1. MICBC is registered under the Securities and Futures Ordinance to carry on business in Type 1 (dealing in securities) regulated activity.
  2. The case was referred to the SFC by the HKMA which conducted an investigation into MICBC after identifying various irregularities in MICBC’s selling practices of CISs during an onsite examination.

Source link

Regulator Information

Abbreviation: SFC
Jurisdiction: Hong Kong

Recent Articles

Proposed amendments to permit reduced margin for swap position partial offsets held in inventory

Executive Summary IIROC is proposing amendments to the IIROC Rules (Proposed Amendments) that would permit margin reductions for Dealer Member (Dealer) inventory offsets of: non-equivalent...

FINRA Requests Comment on a Proposal to Shorten the Trade Reporting Timeframe for Transactions in Certain TRACE-Eligible Securities From 15 Minutes to One Minute

Summary FINRA is soliciting comment on a proposal to amend Rule 6730 to reduce the Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (TRACE) trade reporting timeframe for transactions in all TRACE-Eligible Secur

FINRA Reminds Firms of Their Obligation to Supervise for Digital Signature Forgery and Falsification

Summary FINRA has received an increasing number of reports regarding registered representatives and associated persons (representatives) forging or falsifying customer signatures, and in some cases s

Notice of Annual Meeting of FINRA Firms and Election Proxy

Summary FINRA will conduct its Annual Meeting of firms on Friday, August 19, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time in the FINRA Visitors Center at 1735 K Street, NW, Washington, D.C.

Get the latest from Regulatory.News in your inbox!

×