Aggregated News From Investment Management Regulators

Statement on non-damage BI settlements and deductions in relation to government support


Please complete the required fields.

In recent weeks, policyholder complaints, stakeholders and media reports have made us increasingly aware of policyholder concerns about how insurers are calculating non-damage BI claim payments where they have agreed liability. In particular, some insurers are making deductions for some types of Government support those policyholders have received over the past few months.

Where insurers have accepted liability, they should continue to handle and assess non-damage BI claims promptly and fairly, and to treat their customers fairly in accordance with Principle 6.

Assessing the appropriateness of making deductions

The insurer will need to assess this for some or all of each type of government support received by the policyholder with a case by case assessment. The assessment should consider:

  • the exact type and nature of the Government support
  • how the policyholder used this support
  • the type of policy and its precise terms, including any set methodology for calculating the value of a claim set out under the relevant section of the policy

Some of these factors will be case and claim specific. Even where it is appropriate in principle to deduct these amounts, a single, uniform approach to deductions is still unlikely to be appropriate. Insurers are likely to need to consider individually the precise details of the policy, the claim and the use and application of the government support the policyholder received. How Government support is treated for tax purposes may differ from the way it is treated for calculating the loss under a BI policy.

We expect firms to take these matters into account when they calculate non-damage BI claims. We also expect them to reflect these matters appropriately in their communications with policyholders when making settlement offers and reaching settlement on relevant BI claims. We will consider how firms treat their policyholders in this way as part of our usual supervisory activities. We may intervene and take further actions where firms do not appear to be meeting our expectations and treating their customers fairly on these points

Source link

Regulator Information

Regulator Name: Financial Conduct Authority
Abbreviation: FCA
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom

Recent Articles

SEC, NASAA, and FINRA Offer Free Resource to Securities Firms to Assist in Detection, Prevention and Reporting of Financial Exploitation of Seniors

Regulators Providing Free Training in Recognition of World Elder Abuse Awareness Day; Program Aims to Assist Firms in Implementing Requirements of Senior Safe Act In recognition of World Elder Abus

Six Charged in Silicon Valley Insider Trading Ring

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced insider trading charges against a Silicon Valley trading ring whose members generated nearly $1.

Portfolio Transfer from Yarden Uitvaartverzekeringen N.V. to Dela Natura- en levensverzekeringen N.V.

Yarden Uitvaartverzekeringen N.V. with its registered office at Transistorstraat 10, 1322 CE, Almere, the Netherlands, intends to transfer its entire life insurance portfolion by way...

Get the latest from Regulatory.News in your inbox!