Aggregated News From Investment Management Regulators

Statement on regulatory framework for virtual asset portfolios managers, fund distributors and trading platform operators


Please complete the required fields.

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) today issued a statement setting out a new approach which aims to bring virtual asset (Note 1) portfolio managers and distributors of virtual asset funds under its regulatory net. It also sets out a conceptual framework for the potential regulation of virtual asset trading platforms (Note 2).

In light of the significant risks virtual assets pose to investors, the SFC will adopt new measures within its regulatory remit to protect those who invest in virtual asset portfolios or funds. The SFC will impose licensing conditions on firms which manage or intend to manage portfolios investing in virtual assets (Note 3), irrespective of whether the virtual assets meet the definition of “securities” or “futures contracts” (Note 4).

In an accompanying circular, the SFC provided detailed guidance and reminded firms which distribute funds investing in virtual assets that they should be registered with or regulated by the SFC and comply with its regulatory requirements, including the suitability obligations (Note 5), when distributing these funds.

“The measures announced today allow us to regulate the management or distribution of virtual asset funds in one way or another so that investors’ interests would be protected either at the fund management level, at the distribution level, or both,” said Mr Ashley Alder, the SFC’s Chief Executive Officer. “We hope to encourage the responsible use of new technologies and also provide investors with more choices and better outcomes.”

“We have also set out a conceptual framework to explore a pathway for compliance for virtual asset trading platform operators who are willing to be supervised by us,” Mr Alder added.

Under this framework, also announced in today’s statement, the SFC will explore whether virtual asset trading platforms are suitable for regulation in the SFC Regulatory Sandbox (Note 6). The SFC will observe the operations of interested trading platform operators and their compliance with proposed regulatory requirements (Note 7) in the Sandbox environment.

If it is decided at the end of this stage that it is appropriate to regulate platform operators, the SFC would then consider granting a licence and putting them under its close supervision. Alternatively, it may take the view that the risks involved cannot be sufficiently addressed and no licence shall be granted as protection for investors cannot be ensured.

The SFC is closely monitoring the development of virtual assets and may issue further guidance where appropriate.



  1. A virtual asset is a digital representation of value. Examples include “cryptocurrencies”, “crypto-assets” and “digital tokens”.
  2. Commonly known as cryptocurrency exchanges.
  3. Where 10% or more of the gross asset value of the portfolio is invested in virtual assets.
  4. At present, many virtual assets do not meet the definition of “securities” or “futures contracts” under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO). As such, managing funds solely investing in virtual assets which do not constitute “securities” or “futures contracts” does not amount to a “regulated activity” as specified under the SFO.
  5. Intermediaries should ensure that the recommendation or solicitation made is suitable for clients in all circumstances.
  6. Please see the SFC’s press release dated 29 September 2017 for details.
  7. The SFC proposes that the standards of conduct regulation for virtual asset trading platform operators should be comparable to those applicable to licensed providers of automated trading services.

Source link

Regulator Information

Abbreviation: SFC
Jurisdiction: Hong Kong

Recent Articles

Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rule 2231 (Customer Account Statements)

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.

Revision of Recommendation 25 – White Paper for Public Consultation

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is conducting a review of Recommendation 25 (R.25) on the transparency and beneficial ownership (BO) of legal arrangements....

ASIC warns super trustees to be transparent in their underperformance communications to members

ASIC today released the findings from its review of superannuation trustees’ communications with their members following the first annual performance test for MySuper products. The...

EBA replies to European  Commission’s call for advice on the Mortgage Credit Directive review

The European Banking Authority (EBA) published today an Opinion and Report in response to the European Commission’s Call for Advice (CfA) on the review of the Mortgage Credit Directive (MCD) .

Get the latest from Regulatory.News in your inbox!